Truth behind the debate

Has much changed since the New York Times article in 2005? (v2)

Search the web for articles relating to ‘Hoodia Gordonii’ and the majority of them will praise it for its ability to promote natural weight loss through appetite suppression. But look for one that says the opposite, they’ll appear few and far between.

In truth, it is rare to find one that truly questions the types of Hoodia products out there. Yet The New York Times did exactly that in an article they released in 2005.

Speaking to leading physicians they questioned the quality and effectiveness of Hoodia products, when there were no human clinical trials to back their statements up.

But their article went beyond this question. They also went on to query the quantity of P57 needed to make these supplements effective.

And their report hit the mark exactly.

Out of 10 UK based Hoodia products tested by Unilever, 2 were found to contain no P57 at all, 4 had small amounts of it and the other 4 contained significant amounts. Add these together and this study suggests that only 40% contain the necessary amounts of P57 to make appetite suppression a reality.

Yet the truth of this situation is far worse.

According to Alkemist pharmaceuticals, over 80% of Hoodia products contain little if any Hoodia Gordonii within their capsules, leaving only a select group that are the real deal.

So as you can see, whilst this article by the New York Times may have been written over 4 years ago, the point of the matter is still the same: how can consumers honestly know that the Hoodia Gordonii supplements they are taking are the real deal?

The present

When you see all these facts accumulated in one place, it is impossible to ignore the accuracy of this article.

Even today the validity over Hoodia’s natural ability to promote weight loss is still under debate.

Yet the only reason this debate exists now is because of the number of manufacturers who are still choosing to offer fake Hoodia products.

Search a little deeper and you’ll find that you are living in a very different time.

One that has got the clinical trials, backing and documentation to offer consumers real customer confidence.

Take appetite suppressant company, UniqueHoodia.

On their website you will not just find a CITES Certificate which will confirm its point of origin as being from South Africa, but also, a certificate of Analysis that essentially confirms that their supplement contains more than is necessary amount to offer consumers effective appetite suppression.

So what can you take away from this article by the New York Times? The need to make sure that you know exactly what you are getting.

You see, whilst there are such companies, such as UniqueHoodia, that can offer you real credible evidence that their supplement works, there are still companies out there whose vagueness and false claims can hurt your chances of successfully losing weight.

So offer your body more. More than words, but clear documented proof.

Tried, tested and proven to contain pure unaltered Hoodia Gordonii, in one compact package, consumers can experience the benefits of:

• 100% pure Hoodia Gordonii
• A calorie reduction of 2,000 calories a day
• 10,000 times the productivity of glucose at suppressing your appetite
• Increased energy and self esteem.

Order your packet of UniqueHoodia today.